An Interesting Read

If you fight against the wrongs of a Mugabe, by portraying him as having absolutely no goodness and as personifying all the evil in the world, while avoiding or failing to see nothing but goodness in Morgan, you are likely to fortify the wrong while failing to prepare for the good that should substitute it after you have gotten rid of what you identified, perhaps rightly as bad, because you diverted focus on the total spread of the badness, which had never been a monopoly of the Mugabe. You would also, perhaps, have prepared the ascendancy of a Morgan, whose suitability you had not critically and thoroughly questioned.

On a similar note, If you fight against the wrongs of a Banda (and let us not forget that even Levy had his share of being similarly fought!), by portraying him as having absolutely no goodness and as personifying all the evil in the world, while avoiding or failing to see nothing but goodness in a substandard and sectarian Sata, a money-mongering and regionalist HH and a Eurocentric Chongololo, equally money-monger type (and you can’t even rule out possibility of such being, even by default, as sectarian (religiously self- righteous claims to being picked by God!) and regionalistic, like, perhaps, young Chipimo, and God-knows who else! You are likely to fortify the wrong while failing to prepare for the good that should substitute it after you have gotten rid of what you identified, perhaps rightly as bad, because you diverted focus on the total spread of the badness, which had never been a monopoly of the Banda or MMD that is so easy And popular to
attack and scandalise. You are also, perhaps, preparing and facilitating for the ascendancy of people whose suitability you had not critically and thoroughly questioned.

NB: I reproduce this write-up from a friend who remains anonymous, as I found it to be an interesting read.